|
Governance
| CJIS Board Members | CJIS
Advisory Committee | CJIS Board and
Advisory Committee Activites |
Funding | Background and History
| Mission and Vision Statements
| Special Projects
- Articulating a united vision and determining
the scope and focus of projects
- Define and sanction project objectives
and timetables
- Appropriately assess risk and set quality
expectations
- Garner support from other stakeholders
and decision-makers
- Monitor planning, implementation, and
management
- Define integrated justice operational
requirements
- Oversee systems acquisition
- Resolve implementation obstacles
- Review system performance
- Focus on enhancements, improvements,
and next phases
- Provide leadership, review business processes
and policies, analyze technical environments and solutions
Why Governance Structures are Critical to Integrated
Justice Success
- Justice integration projects are difficult
and need strong leadership to guide the process
- Integration is strategic and involves multiple
organizations, multiple budget cycles, and multiple funding streams
- Integration involves independent agencies,
elected officials, and separate branches of government. The agencies
include both justice and non- justice agencies that operate separate
systems for collecting and maintaining data critical to carrying
out diverse missions
- Integration involves significant investments
of time and resources and must include stakeholder input
- There are major implications with justice integration:
policy, operational, organizational, legal, cultural, personal,
managerial, and technical
- A governance structure ensures a place at the
table for all relevant organizations and users and ensures equality
in decision-making
- A governance structure provides a recognized
vehicle to strategically plan for integrated justice system
|